Message purporting to be an Amber Alert claims that a three-year-old boy was taken by a man in Rochester MI driving a 2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse with the number plate 98B351.
The claims in the message are false. The message is not a valid Amber Alert and there is no abduction case like the one described. The message is a long-running hoax and should not be forwarded or reposted.
AMBER ALERT ***STOP PLAYING FOR A MINUTE-COPY AND RE-POST! 3 YR OLD BOY TAKEN BY MAN IN ROCHESTER MI DRIVING 2006 MITSUBISHI ECLIPSE. PLATE #98B351 RE POST NOW!!!!! I hope to see this repeated on this page many many times, a child is in DANGER !!!Come on friends… maybe we can help this little boy
This message, which circulates via Facebook, Twitter and other social networks as well as via email, claims that a three-year-old boy was taken by a man in Rochester, Michigan who was driving a 2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse with the number plate 98B351. The message, which purports to be an Amber Alert, urges recipients to repost the information in the hope that someone has seen the vehicle and can help the little boy.
However, the claims in the message are untrue. The message does not describe a genuine abduction case and no such Amber Alert is in effect. The message should NOT be reposted or forwarded.
Variants of the same false alert have been circulating in various formats since at least 2009. The original version of the hoax message is very similar to the above examples except that it omits the Rochester reference. Another early version is virtually identical except that it claims that the boy was taken by a Mitsubishi Eclipse driver in Oregon. Others relocate the Mitsubishi Eclipse driver to Stamford, Delaware, and elsewhere in the United States. Some versions even move the location outside of the United States, including places in Canada, the United Kingdom and Australia. Yet another widely circulated variant claims that the boy was taken in Stockton by a man driving a 96 BMW with the number plate, 98B351NM.
The “Rochester” version shown in the above examples appears to be the most commonly circulated version of the hoax at the time of writing. All versions are equally false. There is not, nor has there ever been a valid Amber Alert like the ones described in these hoax messages.
Sadly, some instances of the hoax message have become dangerously mingled with information and photographs about real missing children. In early 2010, the following version began circulating:
AMBER ALERT******** STOP PLAYING FOR A MINUTE-COPY AND REPOST! 3 YR (RYLEE ALEXANN FOLAN) WAS TAKEN BY MAN IN ROSEVILLE, MI DRIVING 2006 MITSUBISHI ECLIPSE. PLATE #98B351 REPOST NOW! SERIOUSLY!!!!!!! I hope to see this repeated on this page many times
While 10-month-old Rylee was indeed the subject of an Amber Alert, the circumstances of her kidnapping had no relation whatsoever to the fake Amber Alert show in the above example. Rylee was taken by her biological mother and was found unharmed soon after the Amber Alert was issued. Another version included a photograph of Jewel Strong, a three-year-old who went missing presumed drowned after a swimming accident in May 2006. Again, the Jewel Strong case had no connection to the “Amber Alert” described in the hoax message.
Fake Amber Alert messages are not uncommon. Before forwarding any Amber Alert message, recipients should always check that they are legitimate and current by visiting the official Amber Alert Program page on the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children website. Forwarding or reposting hoax Amber Alerts or other fake missing child messages is far from harmless. Sending on such misinformation will certainly not help any missing children and may significantly lessen the impact of genuine missing child alerts. Missing child hoaxes also waste the time and resources of police authorities and other organizations such as the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children who must continually answer questions about the hoaxes from concerned members of the public.
If you receive one of these Amber Alert hoaxes, please do not repost or forward it. And please take a moment to let the sender know that the message is a hoax.
Importance NoticeAfter considerable thought and with an ache in my heart, I have decided that the time has come to close down the Hoax-Slayer website.
These days, the site does not generate enough revenue to cover expenses, and I do not have the financial resources to sustain it going forward.
Moreover, I now work long hours in a full-time and physically taxing job, so maintaining and managing the website and publishing new material has become difficult for me.
And finally, after 18 years of writing about scams and hoaxes, I feel that it is time for me to take my fingers off the keyboard and focus on other projects and pastimes.
When I first started Hoax-Slayer, I never dreamed that I would still be working on the project all these years later or that it would become such an important part of my life. It's been a fantastic and engaging experience and one that I will always treasure.
I hope that my work over the years has helped to make the Internet a little safer and thwarted the activities of at least a few scammers and malicious pranksters.
A Big Thank YouI would also like to thank all of those wonderful people who have supported the project by sharing information from the site, contributing examples of scams and hoaxes, offering suggestions, donating funds, or helping behind the scenes.
I would especially like to thank David White for his tireless contribution to the Hoax-Slayer Facebook Page over many years. David's support has been invaluable, and I can not thank him enough.
Closing DateHoax-Slayer will still be around for a few weeks while I wind things down. The site will go offline on May 31, 2021. While I will not be publishing any new posts, you can still access existing material on the site until the date of closure.
Thank you, one and all!